Since 2015, the Quality Payment Program (QPP) has been the framework guiding the shift from volume to value. Created by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), QPP replaced the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula and consolidated prior reporting programs like PQRS, Meaningful Use, and the Value-Based Payment Modifier into one performance-based system.

This fall, CMS is expected to finalize updates to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) that will take effect in 2027.

A closer look at the new federal investment aimed at easing Medicaid cuts in rural communities

July was UV Safety Month, and while dermatologists are on the front lines of skin health education and cancer prevention, they’re also navigating another complex demand: quality reporting under Medicare’s evolving programs.

CMS’s 2026 Proposed Rule marks a decisive turn in the nation’s shift toward value-based care with implications for reimbursement, reporting strategy, and how providers define success in Medicare.

As CMS continues to advance its mission of improving care quality while reducing unnecessary costs, a new model is emerging on the horizon that shifts the spotlight toward services that should be avoided.

Many health systems understand that value-based care is the future, but few have the infrastructure to succeed within it, especially when it comes to performance reporting. Fragmented data, unclear attribution, and evolving CMS measures create significant barriers that undermine even the best care strategies. Partnering with a CMS-qualified registry helps close these gaps by aligning documentation, aggregating data, and ensuring timely, accurate reporting that drives real value.

Virtual care is reshaping how quality is measured—challenging outdated systems and raising the stakes for compliance. Discover how providers can adapt reporting strategies to stay ahead in a digital-first landscape.

The U.S. healthcare system is shifting. It’s not just a reimbursement transition; it’s a complete redefinition of how quality, outcomes, and value are measured.

As CMS continues its transition toward digital quality measurement and population-based models, ACOs must be more strategic than ever in how they collect, report, and act on performance data. Explore what ACOs need to know to craft a sustainable and positive path forward.

CMS has released initial participation and performance data for the 2023 Quality Payment Program. The data serves as a useful benchmarking tool for practices, health systems, and ACOs seeking to understand where their performance aligns or diverges from national trends.

Success in CMS reporting—whether for MIPS, MSSP, or APMs—requires a proactive, year-round approach, not a last-minute scramble. Reactive strategies often lead to missed opportunities, data gaps, and costly penalties, while proactive organizations continuously monitor performance, engage clinicians early, and use technology to drive improvement. Partnering with a CMS Qualified Registry like Quantician empowers providers to shift from compliance to strategy—boosting scores, maximizing incentives, and building a culture of quality.

When used correctly, your 2024 feedback report can provide powerful insight to guide smarter decisions for 2025. Let’s break it down and explore how to read between the lines of your CMS feedback — and turn it into better performance and reimbursement next year.

Whether you're managing reporting for a solo provider or a multi-specialty group, the reality is the same: MIPS is confusing. Before it becomes too late, explore the five most confusing parts of MIPS and offer ways your practice can simplify the process for better outcomes.

If you provide primary care services, especially to patients with chronic conditions, APCM could be a major win for both patient care and your bottom line. But the key is understanding how to bill for it correctly.

The 2025 Final Rule for the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) shows that while many elements remain stable, there are several significant changes that practices should be aware of.

2025 MIPS payment adjustments have gone into effect for eligible clinicians that participated in the Quality Payment Program in performance year 2023.

For many specialists, reporting MIPS measures can feel like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Standard MIPS measures are designed to be broadly applicable across specialties, often leaving gaps when it comes to reflecting the unique needs of specific patient populations. That’s where Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) measures come in.

As healthcare practices prepare for the 2025 performance year under CMS's Quality Payment Program (QPP), staying informed on key dates and deadlines is crucial for maximizing your success.

CMS recently released its Calendar Year 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, bringing important changes for healthcare providers participating in the Quality Payment Program (QPP). This update affects the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), and Alternative Payment Models (APMs).

Learn the key exceptions, their deadlines, and why an eligible clinician might apply for them.

The APM Performance Pathway is a vital performance measurement and reporting framework designed for ACOs participating in Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs) such as the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP). The APP serves to simplify and streamline quality reporting for ACOs, aligning performance metrics across various APMs, and improving patient care.

On July 10, 2024, CMS released the Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) proposed rule outlining proposed changes for Medicare payments under the PFS and other Medicare Part B payment policies.

After the 2024 performance year, CMS will retire the Web Interface, marking a significant shift in reporting requirements for ACOs.

Promoting Interoperability (PI) is a MIPS reporting category that measures how well clinicians and healthcare workers use certified electronic health records (EHRs) technology.

Staying on track with the many key dates and deadlines for the 2024 MIPS reporting year ahead can be challenging if it is not all in one place.

CMS is now accepting submissions for quality and cost measures for future MIPS years.

With the 2024 performance year here, it is crucial for small practices to understand each guideline and optimize scores before it is too late.

On March 11th, CMS made the announcement that the deadline for submitting 2023 MIPS data has been extended.

With the potential financial impact to your practice, it is critical that the 2024 MIPS reporting options are understood.

Dedicating time to create a quality measure selection strategy is critical to achieving a high MIPS score in the future.

The Improving Care for Lower Extremity Joint Repair MVP is comprised of measures most often completed by doctors in the orthopedic specialty.

As we know, Medicare is always moving the target when it comes to quality reporting requirements. One such challenge with MIPS is the penalty avoidance threshold, the minimum amount of points clinicians need to achieve in order to prevent them from receiving a negative payment adjustment on Medicare Part B claims.

Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized a rule focusing on streamlining the prior authorization process.

With the 2024 Final Rule, we have seen many changes and additions to MIPS for the 2024 performance year that are critical to take note of.

As you navigate changes in your professional journey, it's crucial to stay informed about your MIPS Eligibility status. Checking the Quality Payment Program (QPP) Status Tool for the 2023 performance year and your initial 2024 status can provide valuable insights into any modifications to your eligibility.

The CY 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule introduces transformative changes for ACOs, ushering in new reporting requirements that demand strategic adaptation.

The 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule has been released and sparked a variety of responses in its wake.

It is essential to understand the differences between MIPS Clinical Quality Measures (MIPS CQMs) and Electronic Clinical Quality Measures (eCQMs).

The final 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Rule will be out soon and there is little reason to believe it will be much different from the proposed rule, based on past years.

As the countdown continues toward the final 90 days for reporting MIPS there are some specific advantages for small practices worth noting.

Has your practice performed for at least 90 days on Promoting Interoperability and Improvement Activities’ measures? If not, the clock is ticking!

MIPS scores directly affect your Medicare reimbursement payments. According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare's reimbursement rate is roughly 80% of the total bill.

Who is required to report MIPS? All eligible clinicians are required to report MIPS data. Eligibility status is based on two things, NPI and associated TIN.

MIPS eligible clinicians, groups, and virtual groups are all eligible to submit an application to reweight any or all of the MIPS performance categories if they are/have been affected by rare events entirely outside of their control and the control of the facility where they practice that would

CMS is moving toward the goal of a Learning Health System (LHS) which will measure care quality using standardized, interoperable data from multiple sources and create a digital environment with rapid access to data on a global level.

Breakdown of the total costs of care measure.

Updates to MIPS in 2023.

The anticipated launch of the MIPS value pathways (MVPs) framework by the CMS in 2021 has been delayed by a year due to the acknowledgment of the challenging situations within the healthcare sector as a result of Covid-19. While the MVPs framework had been finalized and ready for release, CMS acknowledged the concerns of the stakeholders regarding the timeline and decided to postpone its implementation to 2022. The organization also recognizes the fact that clinicians are very busy at the moment to address Covid-19.

Making sure that each patient’s goals are incorporated into their treatment plan is a must for providers that hope to maintain high patient satisfaction rates. One way to help maintain and document these goals for alignment is by having patients complete and Advance Care Plan.

As CMS continues the shift towards value based reimbursement models, the healthcare industry has become more focused on evaluating potential benefits from each of the new associated programs. Primary Care First (PCF) has been receiving a lot of attention due to its limited participation options and significant gains associated with success. The PCF program falls under the MACRA umbrella as an Alternative Payment Model (APM) but offers primary care providers a significant opportunity to increase revenue through demonstrated compliance and increased quality of care.

The rule for the 2021 Quality Payment Program, covering the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM), was released at the beginning of the year. Concerns regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic would impact the program for 2020 and 2021, lead to the release of rules for the MIPS.